Posts Tagged - ‘labor unions’

Post border

NJ Public Sector Employees To Chip In For Health Insurance Premiums

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Image: Hugo90 under CC 3.0

Public sector unions in New Jersey, including the police and firefighters, have grudgingly agreed to pay for part of their health insurance premiums.

Starting June 1st, the state employees will have to contribute at least 1.5% of the cost of their New Jersey health insurance policies. Compared to private sector employees, that’s nothing. Many of the latter have to cover most or all of their own premiums!

For an employee with an annual salary of $50,000, they will have to pay just $750 per year in premiums: a very affordable health insurance option. Despite some previous concessions, these plans are typically comprehensive.

Post border
Post border

Cities Spending More On Employees’ Health Insurance

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Image: GDS Digital under CC 3.0

At a time when many cities and towns are already cash-strapped, they are forced to pay higher rates for their employees’ and retirees’ health insurance coverage, as well as that of their dependents.

For example, the city of Boston is expecting a $20 million increase in this expense. Cities want more control over designing their own health coverage options, because doing so could save them money on health care services they may not need.

What can cities do? They aren’t allowed to run a budget deficit. Many of these health insurance plans were negotiated by labor unions, because a significant number of public employees forgo a higher private sector salary for increased stability and superior health benefits. Changing that agreement would be difficult. Their only choices are to increase taxes, and/or cut other municipal services. Neither is very appealing.

Post border
Post border

Cadillac Health Insurance Tax Hurts Non-Union Workers, Too

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

(Image: Manuel Van De Weijer under CC 2.0)

The so-called tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans has been very controversial. However, most of the talk surrounding it is focused on the impact a tax on high-cost health insurance would have on union members. With relatively few Americans represented by organized labor, the Obama administration has appeared to think that it is a small price to pay in order to encourage companies and individuals to keep health care costs down.

However, a recent study from the Berkley Labor Center in California predicts that up to 80% of those affected would be in non-union jobs. The tax is approved of by Senate Democrats as a way to pay for comprehensive healthcare reform, but Democrats in the House are wary. They received some concessions in Obama’s proposal, but it will still have a far reaching impact on group health insurance.

Supporters believe that less spending on health insurance will result in higher wages, but many are skeptical. People also fear that the quality of their plans will deteriorate, and that the tax will not effectively distinguish between plans that are expensive due to heavily female or older workforces and those that are high-cost due to nonessential coverage (i.e. massage, acupuncture).

Post border