Posts Tagged - ‘health insurance rates’

Post border

More Increases Requested By Massachusetts Health Insurance Companies

Friday, June 4th, 2010

Image: cliff1066™ under CC 3.0

After butting heads with the state government and Governor Deval Patrick’s office, several Massachusetts health insurance companies have once again proposed double-digit rate increases.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts wants an average increase of 12%, and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care wants ones that reach up to 11.9%. These are similar to the previously proposed hikes that were rejected two months ago. They say that they’ve been losing money since then.

If their requests are approved this time around, the higher premiums will apply to health insurance plans sold for three months, beginning July 1st.

Post border
Post border

Health Insurance Book Club: The Treatment Trap

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Image: Amazon.com

Many people believe that one of the main causes of rising health care costs is the overuse of care. A new book, The Treatment Trap: How the Overuse of Medical Care Is Wrecking Your Health and What You Can Do to Prevent It details cases of the thousands of Americans injured or killed by unnecessary procedures.

These expensive procedures end up with health insurance rates raised to cover the cost, and to what end? Authors Rosemary Gibson and Janardan Prad Singh claim that there many procedures performed are wasteful. For example, why are women given a Pap smear (which tests for cervical cancer) if they’ve already had a hysterectomy–meaning that their cervix was removed?

Fear of medical malpractice lawsuits is just one of the reasons why the health insurance system is forced to foot the bill. This book helps to keep patients informed of the risks they take when seeking a diagnosis.

Post border
Post border

Sebelius Puts More Heat On WellPoint’s Health Insurance

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Image: Listphile

Recently, WellPoint has been one of the most controversial health insurance companies. Their rate increases and alleged dumping of policyholders with breast cancer have received much criticism.

Although they have taken some steps to repair their reputation, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius wants more. She is urging state insurance departments and governors to further examine the insurer’s proposed rate increases. In addition, she wants governors to make sure that states have the authority to review and approve health insurance plan rate changes.

Their increases in California gained the most attention, and the up to 39% price hikes have been blamed on an accounting error. Sebelius wants other states to check for similar errors.

Post border
Post border

Health Insurance Rate Increases Blocked Temporarily

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Image: walknboston under CC 3.0

Yesterday, a judge in Massachusetts denied health insurance companies’ requests for rate increases. They were seeking to increase small business and individual health insurance rates anywhere from 8% to 32%.

The judge blocked a preliminary injunction that would’ve blocked the state Insurance Department’s refusal of the rate increases. The insurers can–and will–appeal, but for now they must continue offering health insurance plans at last year’s rates.

Post border
Post border

Health Insurance Companies Justify Rate Increases

Monday, April 12th, 2010

(Image: AMagill under CC 3.0)

Today, a judge will decide if Massachusetts health insurance companies’ proposed rate increases can go forward. The state’s insurance commissioner refused to allow over 200 premium increases, stating that they were unreasonable in a recession.

Insurers are seeking a preliminary injunction that would allow them to begin charging the higher rates, which are 8% to 32% higher than last year’s. They believe that being forced to stick with the lower rates would put them out of business.

The state’s attorney general, however, states that the insurers haven’t exhausted the entire appeals process–they shouldn’t have assumed that the commissioner would automatically approve their proposals. Until the state acts, they should be prepared to sell affordable health insurance at the previous rates.

Post border
Post border

Health Insurance Rates Go Up With Medical Imaging

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

(Image: anolobb under CC 3.0)

Medical imaging tests are an innovation that have helped many people catch diseases before they spread and improve their health. However, they have caused health insurance rates to skyrocket over the past two years.

There are several factors responsible for the 20% increase:

  • Investment in expensive new machines, such as digital mammography machines
  • More imaging tests being performed in hospitals, instead of cheaper freestanding clinics, which are up to twice as expensive
  • An increase in the number of tests performed by doctors
  • Hospitals substituting tests with higher reimbursement rates (e.g. CT scans) for ones with lower reimbursement (e.g. X-rays)
  • Hospitals increasing prices for the same treatments

Health insurance companies often require pre-authorization before paying for medical imaging, but they often pay high rates when it is approved.  They pay significantly higher amounts to hospitals that perform digital mammograms as opposed to standard film mammograms, even though the former have not yet proven to be more effective. Doing so encourages hospitals to encourage such tests, even when it may be wasteful.

The cost is then passed onto patients through their health insurance plans.

    Post border
    Post border

    Infants Charged Higher Family Health Insurance Rates!

    Friday, February 26th, 2010

    (Image: Pink Sherbet Photography under CC 3.0)

    Over in North Carolina, health insurance company Blue Cross Blue Shield recently increased its health insurance rates. While rate hikes are common nowadays, this one is especially far reaching: it even hits babies!

    Case in point: a nine-month-old infant’s family health insurance premium jumped by 55% on January 1st. According to BCBS, the higher premium is justified because infants use more health care services than older children. Now, they are classified in a higher-risk insurance pool.

    This situation is absurd! Some may argue that many people with pre-existing conditions facing a dearth of affordable health insurance options brought the situation on themselves; that they neglected their health and had bad habits. While that can certainly be debated, a baby less than a year old has no choice in or responsibility for his or her health. Plus, this particular infant didn’t even have any conditions that would cost more to cover!

    Post border
    Post border

    Health Insurance Rate Increases Limited Under Obama Plan

    Monday, February 22nd, 2010

    (Image: jurvetson under CC 2.0)

    We’re beginning to hear more details about the healthcare reform proposals President Obama is bringing to the table for the bipartisan summit. Despite some setbacks, to Republicans’ dismay he is moving forward and splitting the difference between the House of Representatives and Senate health insurance bills.

    However, it adds a new element. One of the primary focuses of the legislation will be to clamp down on the increase of health insurance rates. Controversy over price hikes (during a recession, no less) in California and other states has breathed new life into the debate, and relevant provisions recently proposed by Rep. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) will probably play a part in the new bill.

    The bill would immediately give the federal Secretary of Health and Human Services the power to review and block health insurance premium increases. Some states already have that authority, while others have no teeth and can only recommend further action by private insurers. In contrast, the federal government would be able to force health insurance companies to give consumers rebates or reverse premium increases if they are deemed excessive.

    It would also create a Health Insurance Rate Authority–made up of industry experts–which would release annual reports determining what level of rate increases is “reasonable” given the market.

    Republicans are understandably against further government intervention in private enterprise. In addition, it presents the issue of states’ rights: currently, each individual state is responsible for regulating the sale of health insurance plans within its borders. Several state governors want to be included in any changes.

    Post border