Posts Tagged ‘family health insurance’

Post border

Infants Charged Higher Family Health Insurance Rates!

Friday, February 26th, 2010

(Image: Pink Sherbet Photography under CC 3.0)

Over in North Carolina, health insurance company Blue Cross Blue Shield recently increased its health insurance rates. While rate hikes are common nowadays, this one is especially far reaching: it even hits babies!

Case in point: a nine-month-old infant’s family health insurance premium jumped by 55% on January 1st. According to BCBS, the higher premium is justified because infants use more health care services than older children. Now, they are classified in a higher-risk insurance pool.

This situation is absurd! Some may argue that many people with pre-existing conditions facing a dearth of affordable health insurance options brought the situation on themselves; that they neglected their health and had bad habits. While that can certainly be debated, a baby less than a year old has no choice in or responsibility for his or her health. Plus, this particular infant didn’t even have any conditions that would cost more to cover!

Post border
Post border

North Carolina Family Health Insurance Rates To Rise

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

(Image: Ed Yourdon under CC 3.0)

As the second half of the bipartisan healthcare reform summit continues, a story out of North Carolina highlights why health insurance is such a vital issue.

The state’s Blue Cross Blue Shield was recently allowed to increase their health insurance rates by an average of 12%. Some policyholders have seen their premiums increase by 50% or more! North Carolina residents are in a tight bind, since Blue Cross Blue Shield makes up 97% of the individual health insurance market in the state.

Gender rating, an issue that has garnered attention during the summit, plays a role. BCBS of North Carolina had a standard policy of charging higher premiums to young women under a family health insurance plan once they turn 18, but cost increases have led to them lowering the age at which the higher premiums apply.

Post border
Post border

Health Insurance and Rationing: Many vs. One

Monday, February 8th, 2010

(Image: tiarescott under CC 2.0)

How much would you be willing to pay for a couple to screen their child for a rare genetic condition? Would you want your medical insurance pay $4.7 million? That’s the amount it costs to prevent one child from being born with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). SMA is incurable and cannot be treated; a child born with it will never be able to move at all. There is an accurate test for it, but routine screening would end up costing your health insurance nearly $5 million to save one child from that fate. That’s because the SMA gene is carried by relatively few Americans and has no symptoms, meaning that the general population–as opposed to just those considered high-risk–must be tested. 11,000 women must be tested at $400 a pop to prevent one case (either by terminating the pregnancy, or using donated sperm or embryos to conceive). By contrast, it costs a relatively frugal $260,000 to provide a person with SMA lifetime care.

The idea of a single child being born with that condition is horrifying. Health insurance companies or the government using cost-effectiveness tests and rationing techniques to decide on health care is scary; cold, hard numbers hold a child’s fate in their hands. Decades worth of studies have shown that, perhaps counter-intuitively, the image of one individual’s suffering is more striking than the suffering of untold masses. Our minds find it easier to feel empathy on a smaller scale. A recent study from the American Journal of Public Health estimates that about 45,000 Americans die each year as a result of going without family health insurance, yet fewer people are willing to risk an increase in their medical insurance rates to prevent their deaths. Proponents of healthcare reform have an uphill battle psychologically; President Obama has attempted to give a name and face to the plight of several uninsured Americans in recent speeches, but his specificity appears to have had little impact.

Post border
Post border

Family Health Insurance Steers Pregnant Women Towards C-Sections

Friday, February 5th, 2010

(Image: Andrea Fregnani under CC 2.0)

It was recently found that almost one-third of the pregnant women in the United States give birth by Cesarean section, a far higher rate than other developed nations. While C-sections are often necessary, they are nevertheless surgical procedures that can harm both mother and child. Many doctors believe that they be performed in only 10% of pregnancies at most.

A common misconception is that American women choose to have C-sections–sometimes even scheduling them–but that is actually relatively rare. Another explanation for the high Cesarean section rate in the U.S. may be our health insurance system. Unlike many other countries, family health insurance reimburses physicians and hospitals with a flat fee for the birth, regardless of how it is performed. Some doctors may unconsciously steer their patients towards a C-section, since medical insurance doesn’t offer an incentive for them to perform longer vaginal labor instead. To the contrary: some medical insurance companies actually have higher reimbursement rates for C-sections!

Meanwhile, most hospitals can charge far more for a Cesarean section birth, which gives them more opportunity to pad their maternity care profit margins. In addition, doctors may also be performing C-sections in order to lessen the risk of a medical malpractice claim being filed against them; physicians tend to be sued for failing to take action more often than taking the wrong action. Breech babies (which are in the wrong position for vaginal birth) can sometimes be turned around through changes in positioning and waiting, but time pressures and legal concerns reduce the likelihood that an obstetrician would take that risk. All of those factors combine, and the cost is passed onto the new mother through her family health insurance premiums.

Post border
Post border

Don’t Put Your Girlfriend On Your Family Health Insurance!

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

(Image: Tambako the Jaguar under CC 2.0)

Family health insurance is often an affordable way to make sure your loved ones remain in good health. However, you have to make sure all of your legal paperwork is in order. Although cohabitation is more common, some benefits are only afforded to married couples (or those with formal domestic partnerships).

In New York, a man named named Robert M. Moore was arrested for fraud. His crime? Listing his live-in girlfriend as his wife in order to put her on this health insurance policy. She used over $13,000 worth of medical insurance, prescription drug coverage, and dental insurance. She hasn’t been arrested, whereas her lover is charged with third degree larceny and fraud.

People often do misguided things for love. It’s understandable that Moore wanted to care for his girlfriend, especially if she has pre-existing conditions that prevent her from buying individual health insurance coverage at an affordable price. Health is certainly more valuable than flowers and candy. Unfortunately, the State Insurance Department doesn’t agree. He faces up to seven years in prison. So think twice before giving your boyfriend or girlfriend a contract with their name on your health insurance policy for Valentine’s Day. If you’re worried about their access to health insurance, you might want to go ahead and put a ring on it instead.

Post border
Post border

Save With Community Health Centers

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010


(Image: Evil Erin under CC 2.0)

If you’re uninsured, you can end up in a bind. Without a health insurance plan, many people are unable to afford to visit a doctor. However, going to the hospital is also expensive–and often unnecessary. Although you can receive treatment that way, the cost is passed on to the public through higher medical insurance premiums. Then health insurance is even further out of reach!

What’s the solution? Community health centers may be an effective, cheap way to provide preventative care to people who are uninsured or under-insured. Those who live in rural areas far away from hospitals can also benefit. The federal government has decided to increase funding for these centers, which will allow them to treat more poor and working-class children and adults. It is estimated that a quarter of low-income children who lack family health insurance receive primary care from these centers.

The network of 1,200 community health centers in the United States will receive $290 million in President Obama’s latest budget. That’s on top of the $2 billion they received in last year’s stimulus package. A group of researchers recently found that every extra $500,000 in funding allows such centers to take over 500 more uninsured patients each, while creating jobs.

Post border
Post border

State Medicaid Boost In Fed Budget

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Call it the Nebraska affect.

After the Cornhusker State landed a pot of previously unavailable money in exchange for its “Yes” vote on the now fumbled Senate healthcare reform bill, the Obama Administration is expected to announce on Friday a proposal that would add another $25 billion worth of funds to states to use for Medicaid, according to the AP.

The Medicaid windfall is expected to mirror the economic stimulus program that took effect last year, where non-recurring Medicare funds were divvied up among states with the highest unemployment rates. Under the new initiative, the Feds will take on a higher stake of state Medicaid funds for a period of six months (or until July, as proposed) with every state in the U.S. getting an additional 6.2 percent of its current Medicaid budget paid for by federal dollars. Again, those states with higher unemployment are slated to get more.

The proposal is the centerpiece of President Obama’s 2011 budget. It is unclear whether the measure will be wrapped up in the Administration’s $174 billion “Jobs Bill” that Obama unveiled at his State of the Union address last week, or if it would be presented to Congress as part of a special line item. Regardless, if the Medicaid measure passes both houses of Congress, the money would not be made available to states until next year. Obama already has a bit of a head start on getting the measure passed since the House already passed the Medicare extension in a previous session.

Although his budget is highly unlikely to be passed without some significant cuts by Congress, the Obama Administration is stemming the tide of requests from state and local leaders with large populations of unemployed workers who are facing the end of federally-subsidized COBRA health insurance plans. Coupled with a growing pool of retired and elderly citizens who are living on fixed incomes during the nation’s second worst economic recession, the coming Senatorial elections this November and Congress is expected to rubber stamp Obama’s proposed boost in Medicare spending. Aside from the usual partisan bickering about budgets and deficits, we can also expect some debate about the disparity of Medicare funds available to large states like California and Texas, both of which also have a large unemployed population.

Reuters is reporting today that about $645 billion total of the Obama budget is specifically earmarked as money for various state economic and emergency funding programs. One half of that money is dedicated to various reforms for health insurance companies designed to extend affordable health insurance to to the unemployed and economically disadvantaged.

Post border
Post border

Blue Cross Blue Shield Breaks Immediate Care Barrier

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Blue is now taken at Take Care.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida announced this week that effective right away, its four million subscribers can receive benefits under their health insurance plan for medical services provided at Take Care Health Health Systems immediate care centers located inside Walgreens drug stores throughout the state of Florida. With more than 80 percent of all insured Floridians now covered under BCBS health insurance plans, Walgreens is looking to boost visitors to its Take Care locations in hopes of creating a one-stop-shop for medical care.

Walgreens is rapidly playing catch-up in the trend toward walk-in medical care as its top competitor, CVS is rapidly boosting its retail healthcare presence in the Florida market. CVS’ MinuteClinic walk-in health care chains first started popping up inside its own pharmacies in 2002. The clinics boast over 4 million visits and accept health insurance coverage from most of the major health insurance companies in the nation. Last month, MinuteClinic announced it would begin accepting Humana insurance plans.

Insurance companies and medical care providers are encouraging patients to seek out medical care at so-called immediate care centers as a method of reducing overall healthcare delivery costs. When compared to a typical visit to a private physician or an emergency room, retail walk-in clinics are usually cheaper to use as they are typically staffed by nurses and nurse practitioners and confine their treatment to minor illnesses and injuries.

Health insurance companies are taking a cue from the retail pharmacy industry by becoming more of a retail brand themselves. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida is building a chain of its own “Blue” locations throughout the state. Initially, the insurance giant plans to provide consumer advice and consultations about its insurance plans. Nurses will also be available at the stores to provide simple physical exams and other routine medical care provided for under family health insurance. Look for BCBS to open new stores in Ft. Lauderdale, Miami, Jacksonville, Tampa and Orlando soon.

Post border
Post border

FAQ: Finding Affordable Health Insurance For Autistic Children

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

If your child is autistic, you are no doubt familiar with the financial and health challenges involved. Unfortunately, many health insurance policies do not cover treatments for what has become a more prevalent condition. Doctor visits, prescriptions, speech and occupational therapy all add to the cost involved: anywhere from $67,000 to $72,000 per year, depending on where the child is on the autism spectrum.

Here are some answers to questions you may have when you are struggling with this family health insurance issue.

Q: Does my state mandate health insurance coverage for autism?
A:
The following states currently require all health insurance sold within their borders to offer autism-related coverage, which is a start:

  • Arizona
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Louisiana
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Carolina
  • Texas
  • Wisconsin
  • New Hampshire and Maine also have pending legislation. Remember that the specific types and level of coverage vary among states.

    Q: What if my state doesn’t require health insurance plans to cover autism-related treatments?
    A:
    An increasing number of large employers include autism coverage in their plans. Failing that, it is possible to buy family health insurance on the open market–although in some cases, it may be more affordable to buy a specific individual health insurance plan for your child. It is essential to shop around for the right plan, which will provide for the care your child needs.

    Q: What should I think about when buying health insurance for my autistic child or children?
    A:
    The needs of the child should come first, just like they should for non-autistic children. You must think about the recommended treatments for your child and the cost of those treatments. Many health insurance options cover autism, but have annual or lifetime limits on the amount that can be spent. Behavioral therapy and other techniques are often expensive, eating through a $36,000 yearly cap surprisingly quickly. A nonverbal child will probably require a more comprehensive policy than a child with a milder form of autism. Some health plans may also limit the number of times per year a child can visit a particular type of therapy session. Also keep in mind that certain medical conditions, such as gastrointentional problems, are more common; therefore, it is important to make sure those are covered.

    Q: How can I make sure that my health insurance company doesn’t deny my child’s claim?
    A:
    Health insurance companies have certain protocol and procedures they depend on when deciding whether to approve or deny a medical claim. These procedures are often based on years of scientific studies based on the average population. Individualized treatment is often necessary with autistic children, leaving it to parents to argue in favor of a particular course of action. It is best to pick a plan with a positive reputation and good customer service, and come armed with research and expert referrals.

    Q: What if I can’t afford to pay for my child’s autism treatments?
    A:
    There are several options available, including financial subsidies from private organizations like United Healthcare, as well as Medicaid. While the waiting list is long, the program for poor residents will accept children with a sufficiently severe form of autism, regardless of their family’s income. In addition to such waivers, you can bargain with teachers and other caregivers to stretch your healthcare dollars. For example, instead of using your health insurance to duplicate treatment your child is already receiving at school or elsewhere, use it to supplement existing therapy.

    (Image Beverly & Pack under CC 2.0)

    Post border

    Archives

    Talk to a VitalOne Specialist

    Call now to
    discuss your
    health insurance
    options

    1-866-488-5200