Posts Tagged - ‘democrats’

Post border

COBRA Subsidy Extension Fails; Get Short Term Health Insurance

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Image: Napalm filled tires under CC 3.0

A divided Congress failed to pass a bill that would have extended the COBRA health insurance subsidy for jobless workers. COBRA allows ex-employees to continue on their old employer’s health coverage, but it forces them to cover the entire premium–which they are often unable to afford. As part of the 2009 stimulus package, President Obama included a subsidy of up to 65% of the cost of COBRA coverage for those laid off during the recession.

Unfortunately, millions are still unemployed. The subsidies are steadily expiring, but budget concerns have made moderate Democrats (with an eye on winning re-election in November) leery of passing yet another big spending bill. President Obama has begged them to renew the subsidy, but to no avail. As a result, many will let their coverage expire and become uninsured.

However, there is a solution. Short term health insurance coverage can be kept only as long as you need it, until you find another job with health benefits. Most options are typically less generous than a previous employer’s insurance may have been, but that means that it will be more affordable. Such coverage protects you against essential emergencies.

Post border
Post border

COBRA Health Insurance Subsidy Expires

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Image: clementine gallot under CC 3.0

COBRA is a law that allows laid off or otherwise unemployed employees to retain their group health insurance coverage. Unfortunately, many people are unable to utilize it due to the high cost. Former employees must pay the full cost of the premium (as opposed to having it partially covered by the company), plus an administrative fee.

A subsidy of up to 45%–included in last year’s stimulus package–allowed those who lost their jobs between September of 2008 until this May to more easily afford health insurance coverage. That help expired on June 2nd. Some may choose individual health insurance instead, but similarly priced plans on the individual market include less coverage, and are still able to reject people with pre-existing conditions until 2014.

Democrats in Congress are currently trying to reinstate the subsidy, since unemployment rates are still high (despite the official end of the recession). However, many are worried that the expense is too high to add onto an existing budget deficit, so its chances of passing are relatively remote.

Post border
Post border

New Pro-Healthcare Reform Ad

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Image: videocrab under CC 3.0

Gearing up for the midterm elections, Democrats have recently started airing a TV commercial that makes their argument in favor of healthcare reform. It points out that Republicans are calling for a wholesale repeal of the law.

It’s a risky tactic, but recent polls show that a slight majority of Americans prefer that the law be given a chance to work and then modified–instead of throwing it out entirely.

The advertisement also highlights the affordable health insurance benefits that come into effect this year.

Post border
Post border

Voters Want Healthcare Reform Changes, Not Repeal

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Image: shinealight under CC 30

The news isn’t great for Democrats who supported the healthcare reform overhaul: a majority of likely voters in the November midterm elections still aren’t big fans of the legislation. Republicans counting on an electoral sweep shouldn’t be too happy either; the wholesale repeal of the bill they have been pushing for isn’t very popular either.

Then, what does the American public want? According to a poll by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News, a majority would vote for a candidate that is willing to give the law a chance to work, but fix and improve it. Independent voters are especially open to that strategy by a 57%-40% margin. Although they’re still skeptical that the law will have a positive impact and make affordable health insurance more widely available, just 42% prefer the hypothetical candidate that would go back to the drawing board and repeal the current legislation.

Indeed, last month’s special election in Pennsylvania seems to confirm this viewpoint. The Democratic candidate, who expressed similar views (he would have voted against the bill, but looks to make improvements to what is now law), defeated the Republican candidate who sought total repeal.

Post border
Post border

Pro-Healthcare Reform Mailing Spawns Controversy

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Image: Nevada Tumbleweed under CC 3.0

Recently, the federal government sent out an informational pamphlet to millions of Medicare beneficiaries. What’s the problem with that?

The issue is that some people believe that the mailing crosses the line from information into propaganda. The pamphlet talks about how the positive impact the healthcare reform law is predicted to have on its recipients.

Republicans in Congress want the Government Accountability Office to investigate whether the cost of printing and sending the document was legitimate. They contend that the the information about medical insurance in it is biased and inaccurate.

Post border
Post border

Midterm Election Update: Public Option Opponent Faces Runoff

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Image: USDAgov under CC 3.0

The 2010 midterm election season has already started with several primaries. In Arkansas, Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln faced a tough challenge from Bill Halter.

Lincoln was criticized from the left for helping to eliminate the government-run public option from the affordable health insurance reform law.

While the polling shows that she received more votes, the results are too close to call. Therefore, she’ll be facing a runoff in June for the Democrats’ nomination. If she wins, she will then struggle against Republican criticism for voting in favor of healthcare reform–though she voted against the accompanying reconciliation package.

Post border
Post border

Nixon: Healthcare Reform Liberal?

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Image: dbking under CC 3.0

The Barack Obama administration’s affordable health insurance reform efforts are very controversial. Republicans are especially opposed. Many believe that it is a socialist policy.

Interestingly, a modern Republican president went even further. In 1974, President Richard Nixon proposed comprehensive reform to the health insurance system (which shows how long this debate has been going!). Similar to the recently passed law, it included an individual mandate. However, it also included a government-run public option, which so-called “Obamacare” doesn’t.

Nixon was paranoid about Communist infiltrators during that time, ironic for a man whom many current Tea Party members would probably consider socialist on the health care issue. His attempt at healthcare reform was unsuccessful, primarily since he was soon forced to resign due to the Watergate scandal.

Post border
Post border

Sen. Rockefeller Accuses Health Insurance Companies of Weakening Reform

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Image: West Virginia Blue under CC 3.0

Health insurance reform is already starting to make many changes to how insurers do business. Obviously, they were opposed to the legislation, but since it passed they have been attempting to ensure that it’s enforced in the most favorable way.

Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller thinks they may be going too far in trying to weaken healthcare reform provisions. He accuses them of hiring lobbyists to water down the spending rules that will force them to spend higher percentages of the health insurance plan premiums collected on providing medical services (as opposed to shareholder dividends or administrative costs). The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and Secretary of Health Insurance Kathleen Sebelius must make their recommendations on the issue by June 1st.

Specifically, he is warning the Obama administration of accounting and statistical tricks that mask the fact that while many insurers already meet the new standards (a medical loss ratio of 85% in large group policies and 80% for individual and small group policies) in many products and areas, they are not yet universally compliant–although they may aggregate their information together in a way that claims to be. In addition, they may be trying–in advance of the 2014 deadline–to classify as many costs as possible as medical expenses.

Post border
Post border

Bartering Livestock As A Health Insurance Plan?

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Image: hddod under CC 3.0

It sounds like a joke, but it was a half-serious proposal by Republican Sue Lowden, who is vying for the GOP nomination in Nevada to take on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in November. Since Reid helped steer healthcare reform to its passage, he is a clear target.

Lowden looked like a lock for the nomination and even win, with her staunch opposition to the law. However, she slipped when asked about her proposed alternatives to the Democrats’ health insurance plan reform. Her suggestions included bartering for health care services–specifically citing our grandparents, who supposedly brought a chicken to the doctor.

Her primary opponents, as well as Democrats, have run with the absurdity. Offhand quip or not, it makes her appear out of touch with the struggles of those unable to find affordable health insurance in modern times. Lowden’s response is the classic bipartisan political excuse: her comments were taken out of context.

Post border
Post border

Obama Continues To Promote Health Insurance Reform

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Image: hlkljgk under CC 3.0

The marketing campaign is seemingly endless. President Obama is once again touting what he considers as the benefits of affordable health insurance reform.

During his weekly internet and radio address, Obama says that there are already signs of immediate benefits. Even before most of the provisions will become effective, health insurers are taking steps in advance to increase accountability and be more consumer-friendly. They are ending the practice of rescinding policies, and extending coverage for young adults before it is required in order to eliminate gaps.

The president continued to strike at the health insurance companies in order to shore up support for the law before much of his party is up for re-election, while promoting that fact that up to 4 million individuals and small businesses may see tax cuts this year.

Post border