Archive for the ‘Group’ Category

Post border

Insurers Testing Out Controversial Health Plan

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

A new type of medical insurance will soon be available to workers in Portland, Ore. Here is how it works: Participating health insurance plans will offer free health care for certain illnesses such as diabetes or depression. Sounds to good to be true, and maybe it is. There are selected treatments that will cost you pretty big. The insurers have singled out selected treatments that are often overused, including knee replacements, hysterectomies, and heart bypass surgery.

The new insurance is an attempt to control medical spending that continues to rise and impact health insurance premiums.

“We’re trying to make people better consumers,” says John Worcester, head of benefits at Evraz Oregon Steel, the sole employer to sign up since the plans began coming on the market earlier this year.

Workers who choose the option over a more traditional plan next year could see their costs drop sharply if they have one of six chronic conditions but might pay hundreds more in deductibles and co-payments if they need a hip replacement or a heart stent.

Those who support the new plan feel it will improve health and reduce medical costs. However, critics warn the plan will limit access to certain medical services. People who are advised to have one of the overused treatments will be discouraged from them due to the high costs. The plan could have an adverse affect of hurting individuals instead of helping them.

Post border
Post border

Group Health Insurance Equality In Mental Health Coverage

Monday, March 8th, 2010

(Image: Rep. Keith Ellison under CC 3.0)

With a standard health insurance plan, many people have noticed a disparity between physical health coverage and mental health coverage. Co-payments for visiting therapists or psychiatrists tend to be higher than those for other specialists, while anti-depressants and other medications can be more expensive than other prescription drugs.

A new federal law effective July 1st has changed all that. The legislation requires that the majority of group health insurance plans that cover mental health have parity in coverage–which means that health insurance companies cannot charge higher deductibles, co-pays, or co-insurance percentages for mental health treatments than they do for other health care.

The downside is that the new guidelines only apply to employer-sponsored health plans from companies with over 50 employees. They also do not encourage employers that don’t already offer mental health coverage to do so.

Post border
Post border

Cadillac Health Insurance Tax Hurts Non-Union Workers, Too

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

(Image: Manuel Van De Weijer under CC 2.0)

The so-called tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans has been very controversial. However, most of the talk surrounding it is focused on the impact a tax on high-cost health insurance would have on union members. With relatively few Americans represented by organized labor, the Obama administration has appeared to think that it is a small price to pay in order to encourage companies and individuals to keep health care costs down.

However, a recent study from the Berkley Labor Center in California predicts that up to 80% of those affected would be in non-union jobs. The tax is approved of by Senate Democrats as a way to pay for comprehensive healthcare reform, but Democrats in the House are wary. They received some concessions in Obama’s proposal, but it will still have a far reaching impact on group health insurance.

Supporters believe that less spending on health insurance will result in higher wages, but many are skeptical. People also fear that the quality of their plans will deteriorate, and that the tax will not effectively distinguish between plans that are expensive due to heavily female or older workforces and those that are high-cost due to nonessential coverage (i.e. massage, acupuncture).

Post border
Post border

Man Has 1,000-Mile Commute For Health Insurance Coverage

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

(Image: CBGB Hoser under CC 2.0)

The auto industry has been one of the most hard hit during this recession. Many General Motors employees are a case in point; plants have closed across the country, leaving tens of thousands of people without jobs and generous health insurance benefits. Others, such as Michael Hanley, have kept their jobs: however, he has been transferred to another plant several states away.

Why would a man commute from Wisconsin to Kansas for work each week, sacrificing family time? Access to health insurance coverage plays a large role in it. Hanley’s wife, Laura, suffers from a rare blood disorder that can lead to cancer, and she requires chemotherapy. She needs a comprehensive health insurance plan to cover the cost of her treatment; the annual deductibles alone reach tens of thousands of dollars. Most companies don’t offer group health insurance as generous as the plans negotiated by the United Auto Workers union.

The good news for the Hanleys is that they will keep their health insurance after Michael is eligible for retirement.

Post border
Post border

Google: Broadband Good for Health Care

Monday, February 8th, 2010

(Image: dullhunk under CC 2.0)

An increasingly popular trend in health care is the virtual doctor’s visit. Blue Cross Blue Shield health insurance has pioneered one such program in Hawaii. Patients will be able to consult with their doctors more conveniently. In addition, experts will be more accessible–especially to those living in far-flung rural areas. Medical insurance companies are fans of the trend because it has the potential to cut overhead costs. Meanwhile, many patient advocates believe the virtual visit can improve the quality of care.

Google policy analyst Derek Slater also thinks that online consultations could change the face of the medical insurance system of the United States. However, it will be nearly impossible for them to take effect without improved broadband infrastructure. The U.S. has fallen behind many other developed nations in our speed and access to broadband Internet. Slater thinks that health care will see improved efficiency if those improvements are made. It is a potential avenue for cost savings in healthcare reform, while spurring job creation due to the needed construction of broadband lines.

Post border
Post border

Higher Co-Pays Save Money Now, Cost More Later?

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Nowadays, more companies are moving towards offering group health insurance plans with higher co-payments and deductibles. The idea behind such a move is that it saves the firm money by encouraging its employees to take better care of their health. Passing a higher percentage of health insurance costs onto the consumer should make him or her think twice before neglecting their health and waiting for their health insurance plan to deal with it. Unfortunately, evidence from Medicare patients seems to suggest that this strategy can backfire.

It turns out that the patients who saw their co-payments rise actually cost their health insurance plans more in the long run. How is that possible? While they did make fewer outpatient visits, that savings was offset by the increase in hospitalizations and in-patient treatment days. Hospital stays cost health insurance companies more than healthy patients who use regular preventative care services. Higher co-payments discourage patients from visiting doctors and having any illnesses treated earlier and cheaper. It is possible that these findings may also apply to individual health insurance plans.

Post border
Post border

Mental Health Mood Boost: More Coverage From Health Plans Coming Soon

Monday, February 1st, 2010

For decades the National Mental Health Association has been fighting a perception battle amongst the general public; or at least those who are not affected by mental health disorders. So afflicted by its own persona, the association itself recently changed its own name.

Mental Health America! (as it’s now known) has amassed some 300 affiliate organizations across the country who lobby on behalf of their individual members for, among other things, mental health coverage in group health insurance plans. This week, their collective voices were heard and shared by Kathleen Sebelius, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Under a new law affecting all health insurance plans on July 1, 2010, employers and their group health plans cannot limit coverage for mental health treatment for less than the treatment of physical conditions like cancer and heart disease. That means insurers cannot set higher co-payments, deductibles or limits on inpatient or outpatient visits to psychiatrists or psychotherapists. It’s an insurance disparity that’s commonplace with health insurance plans, but one that doctors say have made it extremely difficult for people to obtain treatment for disorders like bipolar disease, drug and alcohol abuse and autism.

According to statistics from Mental Health America!, only about 18 percent of all adults in the United States ever seeks treatment for mental health disorders. The most likely limitation to seeking treatment, say doctors, is medical insurance restrictions on care that is not related to a physical ailment. For years, most traditional group health insurance plans have issued separate deductibles for mental health care and physical health care. The new rules will put an end to this practice, essentially combining these deductibles so those with a need for ongoing mental health conditions can afford to get treatment.

“Patients with mental illness often have general medical conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure that require treatment at the same time,” said Irvin Muszynski, an attorney with the American Psychiatric Association. “So a combined deductible makes sense.”

The change is two years in the making, as a 2008 law was adopted with bi-partisan support that significantly expanded the rights of people with mental health conditions.

Post border
Post border

Public Employee Health Benefits Too Generous?

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

State and federal employees have managed to avoid many of the economic problems that have befallen their private sector counterparts. A significant percentage of them have seen their income increase during the recession, in addition to their job stability. As it turns out, their group health insurance is also more generous.

In the federal and state governments, employees’ health insurance plans are typically paid for in full by taxpayers. Unlike people who have employer-sponsored health insurance plans from private companies, public employees do not have to pay partial premiums. If you compare health insurance plans, those available to public employees often offer wider and more varied coverage than the PPO health insurance offered to the rest of the workforce. For example, they may recieve full health dental insurance, instead of the limited benefit plans offered elsewhere. Many of them also have their healthcare fully covered after retirement, a privilege most private sector employees lack.

How is this possible? Labor unions, which are far stronger in the public sector, were able to negotiate agreements that include affordable health insurance in their contracts. However, more people are coming to the conclusion that something needs to change. In a nation where millions of people are suffering without health insurance, does this group of employees deserve to enjoy that high level of benefits while avoiding risk and maintaining an uncommon level of job security?

(Image: robyn318 under CC 2.0)

Post border
Post border

Do Wellness Incentives Make Health Insurance Cheaper?

Monday, January 25th, 2010

An increasing number of employers have launched company wellness initiatives. These programs are promoted as relatively low-cost ways to promote the good health of employees. They also promise to lower group health insurance costs. The logic is simple: a healthier workforce costs less to insure. Usually, employees can opt in the wellness program: if they do, they are then tested on health-related measures including cholesterol, weight, and high blood pressure. Then, the employee has a certain amount of time (often one year) to improve those health measures if they are currently unacceptable. If he or she lowers their cholesterol level or decreases their weight to a healthy body mass index, his or her health insurance premium goes down. Conversely, if he or she continues to have a high BMI, for example, health insurance rates will increase.

Supporters of wellness incentives claim that it gives employees more reponsibility over their health care and encourages them to engage in preventative care, as opposed to relying on their medical insurance to treat them after the fact. However, such incentives do not appear to have lowered health care costs. Grocery store chain Safeway, whose CEO has heavily promoted such reforms in Congress, did not keep health insurance costs flat after enacting the policy. Rather, the percentage of revenue spent on employee health insurance continued to rise; in 2009, Safeway’s costs actually increased more than the national average!

Republican and Democratic politicians alike have pointed to Safeway as a model for healthcare reform. In fact, the Senate’s legislation would double the penalties and rewards that could be tied to the results of wellness tests (as opposed to the act of simply participating in wellness programs). The wellness test portion of the program was under a year old when its so-called reduction in health care spending was praised. It seems that praise may have been premature.

(Image: Pink Sherbet Photography under CC 2.0)

Post border

Archives

Talk to a VitalOne Specialist

Call now to
discuss your
health insurance
options

1-866-488-5200